Caveman's Watch Forum

Avatar

Attention Hey you vintage Seiko Gurus! Could use some advice and feedback...

Ricky Lee
March 20, 2012 04:39PM
Registered: April 2005
Posts: 13,412 (2012-05)

A co-worker brought me a pair of vintage Seikos which had been languishing in a junk drawer for "several years". While they originally belonged to an uncle of his, he doesn't really have any sentimental attachment to them. Apparently said uncle was something of a packrat, and they'd spent some time in his junk drawer, too.

The first one's an automatic..


Seiko Sportsmatic
Click HERE for larger photo or HERE for supersized photo

..a Sportsmatic model 7625-8233. I haven't been able to find much info on the caliber 7625, but it's a 17-jewel auto which does not hack or handwind, nor is the date quick-set. It appeared in 1964 or 1965, depending on which web site you believe, and was apparently discontinued in the early 1970's. Given that, the S/N dates this example to March of 1968.

The case..


Seiko Sportsmatic
Click HERE for larger photo or HERE for supersized photo

..is full stainless (despite the grunge you see there!), and quite large by vintage standards at 38mm x 45mm. The caseback has obviously been polished to death. Oops! Here's a "found" photo of what it should look like:

Seiko Sportsmatic

The best part is..


Seiko Sportsmatic
Click HERE for larger photo or HERE for supersized photo

Seiko Sportsmatic
Click HERE for larger photo or HERE for supersized photo

..that the movement is quite clean, and has been serviced at least twice, judging by the watchmaker's marks inside the caseback. One carries a 1972 date, but I haven't been able to decipher the other. And it runs like a champ! I tracked it at +9 sec over the first 24 hours and, while I haven't checked the Power Reserve, I have little doubt that it will prove acceptable.

The next one's a quartz...


Seiko Five Quartz model 7123-8440
Click HERE for larger photo or HERE for supersized photo

..A Seiko Five Quartz. Yeah, they really did make such a thing, though apparently only for a scant few years. This is a model 7123-8440, and the S/N puts it at August 1980. Also a full SS case, this one a more "vintage-sized" 34.2mm x 40.5mm.

Seiko Five Quartz model 7123-8440
Click HERE for larger photo or HERE for supersized photo

It's actually in pretty decent condition.. unlike the Sportsmatic, I'm pretty sure the crystal can even be salvaged.

Seiko Five Quartz model 7123-8440
Click HERE for larger photo or HERE for supersized photo

Caseback is still crisp, and that is apparently the OEM bracelet. It's of folded-link construction, a bit on the chintzy & rattly side, and is sized for ~ 7 inches or so.

The fly in the ointment here is..


Seiko Five Quartz model 7123-8440
Click HERE for larger photo or HERE for supersized photo

..the movement. Yeah, it does run. After a fashion. I installed a fresh SR1130SW ( #390) and it immediately started ticking. So I was like "WooHOO! Thumbs up!" But it quickly became apparent that something was seriously screwy. Oops! The watch is running at roughly 1/3rd speed. It takes an actual 3 min 12 sec. for the seconds hand to make a full revolution of the dial. I've never seen anything quite like it. Crazy! Loco! Yes, I've seen a few quartz movements run slow. But never to this extent! And, sure, this movement does have a "trimmer" to adjust the going-rate. We'll see. I'll play with it some, but I'm pretty certain the trimmer won't have enough range to compensate.

But, you say, "So what about the advice and feedback, Ricky? What's your question?!" OK.. how to word it. I guess it boils down to "Which watch would you pick, from a collector's standpoint? See, not only is this bloke not sentimentally attached to either watch, but he's a cheapskate who doesn't want to spend a dime on them. Crazy! Loco! (IOW My Kinda Guy Rolling on the floor laughing my a.. off) So the deal he proposed is that I get one or the other running and looking decent cosmetically for him, and I keep the other in payment. And while he leans toward the slightly, he really doesn't care which. So, basically, I could have my choice of either watch.

Now, I've researched it a (little!) bit, and the Quartz 5 seems to be by far the more uncommon piece. Yeah, there are a few around, but I didn't find any that had changed hands recently. Whether that means they're not in demand, or really are that rare I'm not sure.

OTOH I was able to find a number of Sportsmatics that have sold recently, including several 7625-8233 models. The low was US $40, and the high was $130. An average price for a decent-condition and good-running example seems to be around $75 or $80.

Now, bear in mind that I'm not overly concerned about keeping either piece 100% Original. The Sportsmatic will require a new crystal, obviously. I'll fit a generic hi-dome acrylic if I can. That may not be possible, mind. The OEM unit is of a rather peculiar construction, and it must accomodate the rehaut (chapter) ring. I won't be able to tell for sure until I tear it down, but I may well be forced to source a Genuine Seiko crystal. Assuming they're available, that is. Eek! Remember, we're talkin' a 44 year-old watch here! The hands.. I dunno. I kinda like them, but with the old lume flaking out like that, they ain't gonna fly. I might give reluming them a go.. though replacement Chinese hands are SO reasonably priced. Smile This "found" photo shows what a 7625-8233 looks like with a clear crystal:

Seiko Sportsmatic

Pretty snazzy, IMHO! And a good foundation for a mod, I reckon.

Now the Quartz .. I dunno. Not sure if the caliber 7123 movement is salvageable, or no. I'm guessing probably no. I'm pretty certain I could adapt a TMI/SII PC33. They're dimensionally compatible as far as I can tell, and are certainly reasonably-priced. So that'd be the Poor Man's Solution. But if there is some Collector Interest in these Quartz Fives Blushing then it'd be a shame to Franken it. Thumbs down

So what say y'all? Whistle Any Words Of Wisdom? Smile

TIA!

Cheers!

-Ricky


Messages In This Thread

Attention Hey you vintage Seiko Gurus! Could use some advice and feedback... Image Attachments

Ricky Lee 170 March 20, 2012 04:39PM

Ricky,
I am with Dave on this one. Score them.

I wouldn't pitch the hands on the Sportsmatic, they might be a ringer for the 6105 diver hands. They look like they could be, you would have to do research to find out and if they are someone would pay dearly for them. Not sure it's just a guess at this point.

I have a few Seiko's with the 7123 movement in them and have had that movement worked on. I think there is an adjustment that can be made to speed them up or slow them down.
They are a serviceable movement.

Mark C. 35 March 21, 2012 08:58AM

Re: I am with Dave on this one. Score them.
I'll give it a go. The customer is a traveling sales rep whom I see only bi-weekly, or sometimes weekly if he's got a lot going on with us. So it'll be a bit before I have a chance to make an offer.

Quote
Mark C.
I wouldn't pitch the hands on the Sportsmatic, they might be a ringer for the 6105 diver hands. They look like they could be, you would have to do research to find out and if they are someone would pay dearly for them.
Good eye! According to a couple of web sites I've perused in an effort to learn more about the 7625, these are indentical to the hands used on the 6105 diver.
Quote
Mark C.
I have a few Seiko's with the 7123 movement in them and have had that movement worked on. .. They are a serviceable movement.
If I do end up owning the watch.. Well, we'll see. I might be willing to get it rebuilt, assuming it's not too dear. But, frankly, if the cost is in the ballpark with a mechanical COA service, then I'll probably just go DIY and install a modern quartz movement. Smile
Quote
Mark C.
I think there is an adjustment that can be made to speed them up or slow them down.
There is indeed. And I've tried that. As I expected, it had no apparent effect. The trim pot is intended to compensate for a few seconds a day or week gain/loss, not a 300% + alteration of the going-rate.

But 'twas worth a try! Smile
Ricky Lee 19 March 22, 2012 10:54AM

Keep us posted.Thumbs up! (n/t)

Mark C. 17 March 22, 2012 10:14PM

Oh, no worries there. Wink (n/t)

Ricky Lee 16 March 24, 2012 09:39AM

I would try to keep both!Smile (n/t)

IF 27 March 21, 2012 01:25AM

Here's a link to the service manual, and a thought... PDF Attachments
[thewatchsite.com]

Now in there it mentions a Friction spring for the fourth wheel and pinion, and how it needs to be lubricated at the contact point... So perhaps it's either too much pressure, or no/gummed up lube... If it was putting to,much drag on the works, well, that would slow it down, perhaps..

Flasharry 33 March 20, 2012 11:08PM

Thanks mate! Though.. well, I glommed ALL the tech manuals off WUS many moons ago. Wink

Quote
Flasharry
..too much pressure, or no/gummed up lube..that would slow it down, perhaps..
Could be. Something is sure enough slowing it down!

I'll say this, though.. it's rock solid and steady, not "jerky" or inconsistent at all. It's just slower'n Christmas. Crazy! Loco!

Thanks mate!
Ricky Lee 24 March 21, 2012 06:39PM

Choose 2 nice quartz watches from your collection, and trade them for both Seikos.
Honestly, you could probably find 20 watches in your collection that you would not miss.

Then restore both Seikos properly. Win/win!

Dave M 34 March 20, 2012 09:29PM

Doh! Blushing Why...

Quote
Dave M
Choose 2 nice quartz watches from your collection, and trade them for both Seikos.
..didn't I think of that? Crazy! Loco!

Too obvious, I suppose. Laughing
Quote
Dave M
Honestly, you could probably find 20 watches in your collection that you would not miss.
Oh, aye! At least 20. Rolling on the floor laughing my a.. off

And, now that I ponder it, I'm thinking he'd be all over something with more "modern" styling.
Quote
Dave M
Then restore both Seikos properly.
Well.. "proper-ish" anyway. The OEM crystal for the Sportsmatic is apparently pure unobtanium, so I'm not sure your could really do a sure 'nough 100% Proper Restoration. I am crying

Thank you! Bro. Dave!
Ricky Lee 30 March 21, 2012 06:37PM

No brainer smile I would keep the auto
I think there is more to a vintage auto.
Since the auto caliber is working, you could easily recase it in a better case or work on the case/crystal.

As far as the quartz, new battery, polish case, band may be a new crystal and your friend will be happy. Looks like he doesnt care much about watched anyways. Give him the quartz smile

JP 34 March 20, 2012 05:35PM

That's the Conventional Wisdom, sure. But surely you've noticed that I frequently don't subscribe to Conventional Wisdom. Wink Gif Attachments

Quote
JP
I think there is more to a vintage auto.
Again, Conventional Wisdom. Smile

But looked at a certain way, when it comes to Vintage Watches, automatics are Common As Dirt. After all, practically every Vintage watch 4 decades old or older will by definition be an automatic, or at least a mechanical. They're A Dime A Dozen. OTOH, a 32 year-old vintage quartz is something you don't see every day. Wink

Then, too, there's this: While I've owned a couple in the past, I currently have no in my collection. The contrarian curmudgeon in me, the one that causes me to Root For The Underdog so often, likes the idea of owning a Quartz Seiko Five as my nod to the venerable Seiko sub-brand. Innocent
Quote
JP
Since the auto caliber is working, you could easily recase it in a better case or work on the case/crystal.
No re-casing of the Sportsmatic will be entertained. Oops!

The case is A-OK.. over-polished caseback aside, it's perfectly serviceable.

However. Having now field-stripped the watch, I can tell you that the crystal is one Odd Duck indeed. I am convinced that I can adapt a generic hi-dome acrylic crystal, but "adaptation" it will definitely be, requiring some modification to the commodity crystal. But that's a whole post unto itself...
Quote
JP
As far as the quartz, new battery, polish case, band may be a new crystal and your friend will be happy.
Again, case, bracelet and crystal are salvageable on the Quartz .

The real problem is the movement. My initial experimentation tells me that not only is a new battery not gonna Do The Trick, neither is the adjustment range of the trim pot sufficient to regulate the glacial going-rate. I am crying

So. Either I rebuild the OEM caliber 7123 (ain't going there!), look for a used donor movement (maybe, if the price is right), or swap in a modern equivalent.

I'm leaning towards the latter. Cheap, simple, practical. But if I find out Quartz Fives are sought-after to the point where it's financially viable to Keep It Original, I will do so..

And I'd love to hear more on that latter. Bro. Catalin? Bro Obsidian? Any and all Quartz Fans? Smile
Ricky Lee 39 March 20, 2012 07:33PM

The 7123 is a rather rare beast...
and As such, I'd say its worth the effort...
My watch guy is a pretty good quartz restorer .. PM me..

Flasharry 34 March 20, 2012 07:54PM

Re: and As such, I'd say its worth the effort... My watch guy is a pretty good quartz restorer
Well. Perhaps I was hasty in saying "ain't going there" in regards to rebuilding the OEM 7123. Wink

Obviously I would prefer to keep the watch original, assuming I can do so without selling any body parts, robbing a bank, or such-like inconveniences.

Quote
Flasharry
.. PM me..
It may be a day or two - I've already started working on the Sportsmatic - but I'll do so!

Thank you! Bro. Harold!
Ricky Lee 34 March 20, 2012 08:39PM

Though the 5 quartz is more scarce......the 7625 is also becoming scarce as well....
The crystals are pretty specific as well. I have a gold example that I have not been able to source a crystal for, let alone a stem and crown. It actually is with Boris my watchmaker right now, getting a crown installed. No dice ona a crystal though. Funny thing, the legendary Sea Horse housed that very same caliber. As for the 5 quartz....I have never seen the like. I always thought part of the "5" moniker was automatic. Very interesting piece there....that I would try to fix for sure. Try shorting out the battery contact, or, maybe a run in a jogging machine would do the trick......

dano0 30 March 20, 2012 09:23PM

Re: No dice on a a crystal though. URL
There's a bloke on eFlay with a ton of vintage NOS Seiko crystals. No affiliation, nor can I vouch for him, but you can find him HERE.

His interface is not very intuitive.. hover your mouse over the "More Options" button to see spedific applications. He does have some to fit the 7625... But, unfortunately not the specific one I need. Frowning

Quote
dano0
As for the 5 quartz....I have never seen the like. I always thought part of the "5" moniker was automatic.
A popular misconception, it would seem. Smile I thought so too Laughing until I laid eyes on this one.
Quote
dano0
..maybe a run in a jogging machine would do the trick......
I really, really need to get me one o' them gizmos...
Ricky Lee 72 March 21, 2012 06:34PM


<Back to My Watch Collection>

< Seiko Five Update - new movement >