A Tom Swift Touchup™ of a vintage Seiko Five.
|
Ricky Lee |
173 |
March 31, 2012 09:51AM |
Nice job. Replacing Seiko with Seiko, only the>>
>>purists would have a problem with that.
GS- AT crystal, you say?
Hmmm.... I have a sharp-edged flat-top
in which there is no exterior damage visible, but there is a crack that
you can see through refraction thru the bevel. Drives me nuts to look
at it, and I didn't want to go with a dome.
Thanks!
|
Dave M |
18 |
April 02, 2012 07:39AM |
Great job (n/t)
|
Reto |
19 |
April 01, 2012 07:27AM |
Another job well done! Great results! (n/t)
|
Timemiser |
19 |
March 31, 2012 09:50PM |
Congrats, Ricky, on an amazing job! She looks beautiful! (n/t)
|
Magnum |
19 |
March 31, 2012 07:09PM |
Great work (n/t)
|
pumpkin2001 |
18 |
March 31, 2012 04:17PM |
Lovely! (n/t)
|
IF |
20 |
March 31, 2012 02:55PM |
Excellent job and result! (n/t)
|
James T. Kirk© |
24 |
March 31, 2012 12:14PM |
Looks great! Nice work. (n/t)
|
DJM |
18 |
March 31, 2012 11:29AM |
Purty work Ricky Lee! BTW- if ya see Slim Bo tell him I axed 'bout him.
Another nice redo of a wounded soldier. Congrats on a job well done!
|
itschris |
27 |
March 31, 2012 11:11AM |
Ol' Slim Bo's a Good Ole Boy!
Quote
itschris
Another nice redo of a wounded soldier. Congrats on a job well done!
Bro. Chris.
|
Ricky Lee |
22 |
March 31, 2012 03:39PM |
A trademark? (n/t)
|
MCV |
24 |
March 31, 2012 10:36AM |
Well, not *really*.
"It's a joke, son, a joke I say!"
|
Ricky Lee |
17 |
March 31, 2012 03:36PM |
Nice results again bro Ricky! Your on a roll!!!!
Whats nice too is that you stayed with a seiko
quartz..so....essentially....while not a full original
restoration.......an acceptable one for sure!!! Cheeers!!!
|
dano0 |
26 |
March 31, 2012 10:23AM |
Re: Whats nice too is that you stayed with a seiko quartz..while not a full original restoration..an acceptable one for sure!!!
That was exactly my line of thought!
Still all-Seiko, but upgraded to modern specs. The horological equivalent of a 1957 Chevy with an LS7 'vette motor dropped in.
Quote
dano0
Nice results again bro Ricky!
Thanks me brother!
|
Ricky Lee |
24 |
March 31, 2012 03:34PM |
Git-R-Done! Have you decided which watch to keep? (n/t)
|
Jimmy50 |
25 |
March 31, 2012 10:14AM |
Undetermined. Honestly, the plan is..
..to present the guy with the bill and
persuade him that they're such great watches he should pay cash money
and take both off me hands.
That would put me balance sheet solidly in the black, year-to-date. Frankly, I could use the cash. And, after all, I need another watch like a boar hog need teats.
However, if I know this bloke, there's no way
he'll pony up that kind of dosh for two old Seikos. 'tis almost certain
he'll insist on sticking with the original deal, which is I keep one
watch in payment. If so, I will attempt to "stack the deck" so that it's the Quartz that goes home with me.
|
Ricky Lee |
26 |
March 31, 2012 03:27PM |
Good plan. (n/t)
|
Jimmy50 |
19 |
March 31, 2012 05:06PM |
Congratulations on another great save.
I find this one very interesting as I believe that quartz powered Seiko
5's are not very common, at least one doesn't come across them very
frequently.
|
Paul J Costa |
24 |
March 31, 2012 10:10AM |
Re: ..I believe that quartz powered Seiko 5's are not very common..
They're about as common as an honest politician.
Quote
Paul J Costa
..at least one doesn't come across them very frequently.
I was able to google up 3 or 4. And of those, I think 2 were actually the same watch, and it'd just changed hands.
Hard data is likewise scarce. And misinformation rampant!
I turned up one case of a rather well-known Seiko "guru" assuring
another bloke that such a thing as a Seiko 5 Quartz never existed.
Near
as I can tell they were only made for 3 years, 1980 through 1982. But
please don't quote me, as that's conjecture, to a degree.
Quote
Paul J Costa
I find this one very interesting as..
Aye! As do I...
|
Ricky Lee |
24 |
March 31, 2012 03:17PM |