October 08, 2012 06:29PM |
But now let's have a photo!Quote
Ricky Lee
(is) a brand that I've owned before, liked, and regret parting with. So much so that I put it on me Official WIShlist, albeit near the bottom. So when this clean vintage example appeared at a favorable price I just couldn't resist.
All stainless, screwdown caseback, 37mm w/o crown, all original incl. bracelet, 21-jewel auto billed as "running strong".
Quote
Ricky Lee
Cut to the chase, I'm just pleased as punch with it. It runs fine (maybe +2 sec. to Atomic Time over the ~ 6 hours I've been tracking it), and the condition it better than the seller's photos indicated. To the point that you could nearly convince me it's NOS. Still, close inspection tells me the case and bracelet have been polished, and there are some dial and hands flaws evident under the loupe. That's OK, though, 'cause it reassures me that the watch is 100% Original, not refinished.
A word about that bracelet. It is, of course, too short. By a full inch, at least. So I'm wearing it on a black single-run nylon w/ gold buckle. Not sure if that's the way it'll stay, but it is expedient. I'm thinking this one may need leather. We'll see.
Ricoh Nine automatic, model 61355A | Caveman001 | 111 | October 08, 2012 06:29PM |
I dig the watch and will 2nd the iphone camera problems.
|
greg honeycutt | 14 | October 08, 2012 07:14PM |
Comments, iPhone camera tips 1) The bracelet looks like an almighty hair-puller, so maybe you're not missing out on much with it coming up short?
2) The pusher for day reminds me of Orient's design. Did you look at this movement side-by-side with an Orient, perchance? 3) Those springbars on the clasp are quite proud. Have you thought of a solution yet? 4) Overall, a nice-looking watch. Red arrow-tipped seconds hands on mechanical watches are almost always great, IMHO. 5) With regards to the iPhone camera, did you know if you touch the screen before taking a pic, it focuses and sets exposure at that point? If not, give it a try. Also, there's an app available, which costs $1, called Camera+ that is pure gold. It lets us focus on one spot, but take the exposure reading on another spot. It also has some frou-frou stuff. Check it out. It makes the iPhone camera probably 5x more capable. |
Smaug | 18 | October 08, 2012 08:32PM |
Re: The bracelet looks like an almighty hair-puller.. You may well have a point there.
Not side-by-side, I admit. But the layout is obviously reminiscent of Orient, so I have given it some research, albeit not in-depth research. But..
..it's an entirely different movement, near as I can tell. The balance bridge has a totally different shape, for instance.
Yep! The solution was to remove the bracelet and fit a nylon strap.
Yes, and I did so. Or attempted to, anyway. Part of the problem is that all this tapping and poking is not very ergonomic when you're operating one-handed, going for an photo.
Wasn't aware of that. Though, again, if
I'm outdoors it seems to do much better. Or, put another way, as long as
there's oodles of light available. But perhaps I'll give the app a
shot.
|
Caveman001 | 17 | October 09, 2012 04:51AM |
Re: The bracelet looks like an almighty hair-puller..
The app is possibly even more useful outdoors. For instance, the
other day I was shooting a shot of some trees, in fall foliage, all
lined up. If it took the exposure from anywhere but under the tree, in
the shade, then the tree and its leaves were underexposed. If I took the
exposure reading from the darkest part of the shade, then that was
correct, and everything in the sunlight was blown out. But if I moved
the exposure "bullseye" to just the right spot, I got a happy medium.
You see, it is an inherent weakness in digital photography, especially JPG files, that they have nowhere NEAR as much dynamic range as film. Many of the mid-tones are lost. So in order not to have overly dark shadows or overlight bright highlights, one has to get the exposure PERFECT. Then, choose the lowest compression of JPG you can find, which will lose as few of the midtones as possible. Aside from shooting in RAW and saving as uncompressed TIF, this is the good compromise. |
Smaug | 28 | October 09, 2012 07:28PM |
Very nIce review. The history bit adds a lot (n/t) | jackrobinson | 11 | October 08, 2012 11:06PM |
Thanks for reviewing this interesting watch - I had never heard of Ricoh watches before! (n/t) | JY | 14 | October 09, 2012 02:58AM |