![]() |
September 08, 2012 07:56PM |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Caveman001 | 247 | September 08, 2012 07:56PM |
![]() ![]() |
Jimmy50 | 28 | September 08, 2012 08:19PM |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Caveman001 | 29 | September 08, 2012 08:24PM |
![]() |
dano0 | 32 | September 08, 2012 09:11PM |
![]() ...that I'd sent it to you sooner given your appreciation of it!
![]() John |
JY | 32 | September 08, 2012 10:00PM |
![]() |
jackrobinson | 30 | September 09, 2012 04:03AM |
![]() ![]() ![]() Nice looking watch, Ricky!
Found them online. It's advertised as being dual time, but the pic doesn't show that; it's at least AM/PM. Is the screw on the back the way to the innards? Any reasonable water resistance to this watch? Thanks. |
Oooga Oooga | 70 | September 09, 2012 05:30AM |
![]() |
James T. Kirk© | 32 | September 09, 2012 05:54AM |
![]() The Windy City, that place known to all the hot air politicos, AKA Chicago.
Also am on PMWF. That's where I heard about this forum. |
Oooga Oooga | 36 | September 09, 2012 08:59AM |
![]() But we live in The Netherlands, as I'm Dutch.
|
James T. Kirk© | 24 | September 09, 2012 09:20AM |
![]() Well. First, welcome to the CWF.
![]() And thank you, I do rather fancy the Micenga's looks.
Yeah, I see there are a couple on eFlay at
the moment. Found it ironic that one is priced at US $32.99 Buy-It-Now
with 'free shipping', while the other has a US $14.99 opening bid, with
an $18.00 shipping fee. Either way you cut it, it would appear $32.99 is
the magic price for these.
![]() And I reckon that's a fair price.. I've definitely paid more and got less.
Correct. It's not a true dual-time, but rather an AM/PM indicator.
I don't think so. Bear in mind that this
is speculation, but given the position of that screw, I think that it
releases the stem if you unscrew it. I'm 99.9% sure this is a
front-loader, where the dial/movement must be removed through the
crystal side. If so, the "stem release screw" theory makes a certain
amount of sense.
Another possibility is that it's merely a movement lock. Or perhaps movement holder lock would be more accurate. IOW its sole function is to hold the going-works in position so it doesn't jiggle around inside the case. Thing is, either way it's a fairly novel and unique type of construction. And I can think of a couple of reasons why it would potentially compromise the function..
One of them being a lack of Water Resistance.
![]() Speculation again, But I would be very, very surprised if this design is more than 3 ATM WR. And it may not even be capable of that. In short, I don't plan to get it wet. ![]() Again, welcome to the CWF. Enjoy! ![]() |
Caveman001 | 38 | September 09, 2012 06:27AM |
![]() |
Oooga Oooga | 34 | September 09, 2012 09:02AM |
![]() ![]() ![]() and
![]() ![]() |
Ethan_Mack | 53 | September 09, 2012 06:29PM |