Subject |
Author |
Views |
Posted |
And a long-awaited at that!
|
Ricky Lee |
207 |
February 23, 2011 05:26PM |
Cool, tough, and reliable... Plus, it's from a trusted source! Quite a score! (n/t)
|
Nuvolari |
29 |
February 24, 2011 01:10AM |
Congrats Ricky and keep us posted about the Croton customer service (n/t)
|
Reto |
28 |
February 24, 2011 12:58AM |
Told you it was a biggie! (n/t)
|
MCV |
34 |
February 24, 2011 12:04AM |
Congrats, nice watch and trade (n/t)
|
jeremd676 |
31 |
February 23, 2011 10:04PM |
Re: And a long-awaited at that!
Cool! Especially if you are a mechanic. (Although I know a lot of them
go for Snap-On etc. these days instead of Craftsman, but I am a
Craftsman guy).
Great writeup too.
|
ErikP |
31 |
February 23, 2011 08:46PM |
Re: Cool! Especially if you are a mechanic. ..I am a Craftsman guy).
I'm a mechanic of the Shade-tree type. And, yep, I'm a believer in Tools as well, so it is kind of a natural for me.
Quote
ErikP
Great writeup too.
|
Ricky Lee |
25 |
February 23, 2011 09:02PM |
Bro Ricky Bro Lee Bro, that watch is all you BIG Congrats!
and it would be interesting to see the Jstrap on it, I mean, just one shouldn't hurt too much
|
Riddim Driven |
29 |
February 23, 2011 08:33PM |
Thanks Bro. Riddim! And..
..with two votes for the Jstrap, I will have to try it!
Gimme a day or two..
|
Ricky Lee |
24 |
February 23, 2011 08:57PM |
Sharp-looking watch!
Regarding the seconds hand, you could always just remove it...
IMO,
it wouldn't suffer a bit, and may even improve. A seconds hand that
misses the marks (and badly) is one of my quartz pet peeves. YMMV
|
Smaug |
34 |
February 23, 2011 08:14PM |
Re: Regarding the seconds hand, you could always just remove it...
Well.. I don't mind sans seconds on some styles. But, to me, a diver pretty much demands a seconds hand. Even if it is a mere 1 bps.
Quote
Smaug
A seconds hand that misses the marks (and badly) is one of my quartz pet peeves. YMMV
Luckily I am quite tolerant of this peccadillo, so no such drastic action required.
However, I've got to say, this one misses about as badly as it is possible to miss. The seconds hand falls almost exactly halfway between the hash marks. Thing is, it's pretty consistent
all the way around the dial. So it should be possible to R & R the
seconds hand and cure the problem. Who knows, maybe I'll eventually give
it a go. But that's a project for another day!
|
Ricky Lee |
26 |
February 23, 2011 08:53PM |
Oh, that watch is YOU! Nice trade, guys. (n/t)
|
Dave Murphy |
26 |
February 23, 2011 08:00PM |
Bro. Murphy. I showed it off a buch at work today. Must've had a half-dozen folks ask..
.."If it breaks, can you return it to Sears and get a new one?"
Sure, my standard reply was "Of course! It's a ain't it?!"
Guess my "poker face" wasn't on today, though, 'cause only one guy actually bought it.
|
Ricky Lee |
29 |
February 23, 2011 08:34PM |
Congrats Ricky! Nothing like succeeding in snagging a long-wanted prize! (n/t)
|
StefG |
31 |
February 23, 2011 07:59PM |
Right! The anticipation makes it all the more sweet.
And
|
Ricky Lee |
31 |
February 23, 2011 08:22PM |
That's your watch Ricky. You can stop collecting now.
Only if you really want to stop, mind you.
|
Chris L |
38 |
February 23, 2011 07:11PM |
Re: Only if you really want to stop, mind you.
Ah. I wasn't sure if you noticed the post where I mentioned I kinda sorta planned to take a page from your book.
Not planning to stop, mind you. But I plan to cut way, way back this year. The goals are two-fold, really..
* Have more outgoing than incoming. Way more.
* Turn a profit on the sideline.
We'll see.. this is the first incoming so far this year. And being a straight-up trade, it don't really count.
|
Ricky Lee |
33 |
February 23, 2011 08:19PM |
Great review! Looks made for you! Wonder how that...
jstrap would look on it? Don't recall the width.
|
JohnnyT |
33 |
February 23, 2011 06:54PM |
I never thought of that!
Probably because I am so pleased with it on this Panny homage..
..and also because it would violate my "No divers on leather" rule. Yeah, I know Pannys are technically divers or at least started that way. But I tend to exempt them because there's no Whacking Great Rotating Bezel.
Still.. 'tis really more of a guideline than an actual rule. And the is certainly beefy enough so that the Jstrap wouldn't overwhelm it. Hmmmmm..
Quote
JohnnyT
..jstrap would look on it? Don't recall the width.
23mm,
since it was custom-fit for the Mido chrono. Still, that panhom is a
24mm-lugged watch, of course, and being "under-strapped" by a single
millimeter doesn't look bad at all, IMHO.
Quote
JohnnyT
Great review! Looks made for you!
|
Ricky Lee |
33 |
February 23, 2011 07:57PM |
Hey, I had a bunch for sale at the time, you had your chance. (n/t)
|
Allan Zirlin |
36 |
February 23, 2011 06:52PM |
A bunch? No foolin? I thought you had just the one.
Ah well, "All's well that ends well".
|
Ricky Lee |
29 |
February 23, 2011 07:43PM |
Very cool Ricky! Congrats! I actually found 1 in Sears a couple years ago
I liked the size & thought it would be cool to have. What happened?
It was WAY more than what I wanted to spend! I had no idea!
|
Timemiser |
37 |
February 23, 2011 06:37PM |
I actually looked for one at Sears. No dice.
Mind you, they'd been out nearly 2 years at that point, so hardly surprising they were long gone.
|
Ricky Lee |
32 |
February 23, 2011 07:41PM |
Nice watch Ricky!!!!.....Check your Email!! (n/t)
|
dano0 |
37 |
February 23, 2011 06:05PM |
Quote
dano0
Check your Email!!
Done, and replied.
Wear it in good health!
|
Ricky Lee |
34 |
February 23, 2011 07:38PM |
Bravo for topic and watch ! (n/t)
|
IF |
27 |
February 23, 2011 05:35PM |
Thanks Bro. Yannis! Much appreciated! (n/t)
|
Ricky Lee |
24 |
February 23, 2011 07:47PM |